|
Complaint / Compliment Page
Average Committee: Mike Kennedy, Jason Green, Rob
Richards, Bob Mosier and Scott Mattingly
Currently looking for Seattle (North
End) knowledge to add to 616 Avg Committee
April
6th, 2009
Stated Concern or Compliment: Rerate
Chad Turner, Paul Marcello, Ken Waltman Sr., Mark Plesko,
What can we do to fix the problem?
N/A
Do you want a response from this?
N/A
Tournament response: The above
mentioned was turned in by Marty and this is the Average Committee Response.
Re-Rates must be agreed on 100% by committee:
A)
Chad Turner 186 to 188. Low
success in cashing but has a 208 par avg
B)
Ken Waltman Sr. 203 to 206. Par average of 222, cashed in 3/4 of
events.
C)
Paul Marcello 179, no change. No cashes.
D)
Mark Plesko 196 to 198. Par avg of 209 and cashed in 2/2 events.
March 29th, 2009
Stated Concern or Compliment: Rerate Jeff
Knapp, Ronnie Noel, Rich Eaton, Daniel Nadasky
What can we do to fix the problem?
N/A
Do you want a response from this?
N/A
Tournament response: Average
Committee Response
A)
Jeff Knapp won the 616 at Roxbury
lanes. His team is susceptible to a re-rate.
1.) Jeff
Knapp 206 to 208: 210 Par Avg, Split the difference to bring him up to
208.
2.)
Rob Thompson 184 ent avg, 185 par avg. Only 1 tournament bowled, no
change.
3.)
Bob Davidson 225 to 228: 230 par avg, bring Bob up to 228, split the
difference and bring him up to the same spot on the list as Tom Anderson
and Mike O'Brien.
B)
Ronnie Noel 218 no change, only 1 tournament bowled.
C)
Daniel Nadasky 186 to 188. Committee agreed on 2 pin increase due to 198
par avg and cashing 4/5 Tournaments. A maximum of 193 was considered but
felt his teammates help Daniel.
D)
Rich Eaton 180, No Change because he hasn't cashed in 5 events.
February
16th, 2009
Stated Concern or Compliment:
Jeremiah Meno's Avg, Anthony Escalona's Avg, Rob Richards Avg, I believe all
3 are 210 avg's bowlers. Rob's sport rerate this year is about 210. Jeremiah
is consistently above tourney avg and his entering avg
What can we do to fix the problem?
Take his body of work, Ave, Points won per tourney against tourney avg
Do you want a response from this?
Yes
Tournament response: Average
Committee Response
Tournament winners are
susceptible to a re-rate. This team won the Narrows event and was sent
in to the 616 Average Committee for review:
A)
Anthony Escalona is performing below entering average, no change.
B)
Jeremiah Meno's tournament average is 205, he started the year at 205.
Bump him up to place him in line with similar caliber bowlers.
C)
Rob Richards is averaging 212 after 4 events. No one deserves a huge
re-rate, split the difference and place him at 207.
Appeal:
Rerates of winning team are not high enough. Concern of
re-rating just enough to still let team bowl. They are a strong team.
Tournament response:
Average Committee Response
A) Most teams near the cap
are going to be strong. If 207, 204, and 205 are what they are fairly,
leave them be. If they start running away with tournaments consistently,
worry about it then.
B) Let them bowl as is. We have rated
two of the bowlers up. I don't think any of those guys are out of line
with comparable bowlers on the list at their revised averages.
C) As individuals they are fairly close to
where they should be at this point. Looking at only at the current seasons
numbers and after rating Rob and Jeremiah up the team appears to be fair. I
will say I wouldn't be against raising Rob up a pin or 2 but at this point
its not needed.
D) Team is fair.
Take another look if team wins again.
February
16th, 2009
Stated Concern or Compliment:
Rerate J. Meno, C Riess, J Knapp, T Clawson, R Eaton, M Schultz
What can we do to fix the problem?
Do you want a response from this?
No
Tournament response:
All the above was looked
over by the 616 Average Committee and the following was determined.
A) J Meno, 203 to 205
B) C Riess, 201 to 205
C) J Knapp 206, no change-
performing at 207 Tournament Average
D) T Clawson 200 to 205
E) R Eaton 181, no change-
hasn't cashed in 4 events
F) M Schultz 184 to 188
The above listed can appeal
there re-rate, before they bowl next event.
Appeal:
C Riess' re-rate is after just 1 event and didn't cash.
Tournament response:
Chuck was re-evaluated but because he
averaged 220, plus 24 pins over event average (194), re-rate stands.
November 23rd, 2008
Stated Concern or Compliment:
The following bowlers need to be re-rated, Ken Waltman, Tony Clawson,
Sopheap Phorn.
What can we do to fix the problem?
Re-rate
Do you want a response from this?
Yes
Tournament response:
A.) Ken Waltman Sr is re-rated
to 204, up from 198. The new average is Ken's 3 year composite. Ken has had
a steady decline in book averages. This has been a factor used for all 50
plus aged bowler's ratings.
B.) Tony Clawson is re-rated
to 201, up from 199 which had already been re-rated up from 190 (high last
year book). Tony bowled at Highline lanes last season. Such average from
that league has been re-rated up 10 pins to 200, therefore calculating his
(composite of 3 years) current entering average to 201.
C.) Sopheap Phorn is re-rated
to 194, his last 3 year composite. Under investigating league experience,
Pep bowled a modified House Shot last season at 188. Common 616 practice is
re-rating challenge condition averages up 5 pins if bowler does not have any
or very little house shot averages. Pep is re-rated up to 194 from 188.
| 
